Despite President Donald Trump’s bold claims that US airstrikes had “completely obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, a new report reveals that the US president held back from authorizing a far more extensive military campaign that could have severely crippled Iran’s capabilities.The report by NBC News citing a US assessment of the impact of Operation Midnight Hammer further noted that only one of the three Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed, leading to a significant setback.Trump has previously dismissed any suggestions that the recent US airstrikes on Iran fell short of their objectives, labeling such claims as “fake news”.
A scaled-back operation?
US Central Command had developed a broader strike strategy that included hitting three additional nuclear-related sites over the course of several weeks. The plan, according to officials familiar with its details, would have involved repeated bombardments, attacks on air defense systems, and likely a high number of Iranian and possibly US casualties.But Trump, guided by his foreign policy instinct to avoid drawn-out conflicts, refused to authorize the broader operation.“We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,” NBC News reported quoting a source having knowledge of the plan.Instead, the administration launched a single-night strike involving B-2 stealth bombers and the first-ever combat use of GBU-57 “bunker buster” bombs, aimed especially at the fortified Fordow facility.
Limited impact on Natanz, Isfahan
While Fordo was severely damaged, potentially setting back Iran’s enrichment efforts there by up to two years, the other two sites did not fare as poorly. Intelligence suggests that Iran could resume enrichment at Natanz and Isfahan within months, as the damage inflicted was mostly limited to surface structures.Officials acknowledged that US planners were aware in advance that deeply buried tunnels at those sites were beyond the reach of even the GBU-57 bombs. At Isfahan, Tomahawk missiles were used against surface targets, while Natanz was hit with bunker busters but still retained some functional infrastructure.The latest assessment offers an initial view of the damage caused by the US strikes, as part of an intelligence-gathering effort that officials say will continue for several months. Evaluations of Iran’s nuclear program are expected to evolve over time, and according to officials cited by NBC News, early findings now indicate the strikes may have caused more extensive damage than initially believed.
